The Legal Chronicle

July 2, 2019

Lapse in Security? Auburn, Washington Apartment Shooting Leaves One Person Dead, One Injured.

by The Murray Law Firm

Shooting at Auburn, Washington Apartment Complex Leaves One Person Dead, One Injured. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at an Auburn apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at an Auburn, Washington apartment complex late Friday, June 28, 2019, leaving one person dead and one person injured. According to, “[t]he shooting happened at an apartment complex on the 6100 block of Terrace View Way Southeast.” One person was killed and at least one other person was injured according to the report.

The investigation is ongoing and it is unclear if a suspect will be identified.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victims and others at the time of the shooting?
Was the complex aware of any suspicious activity or suspicious people on property prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the victim’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss. In addition, any injured victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victim’s family and any other injured victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect his interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

July 2, 2019

Security Failure? Jennifer Meadows Apartments Shooting Leaves Man Injured.

by The Murray Law Firm

Shooting at Jennifer Meadows Apartments Leaves Man Injured. (WREG.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Memphis apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

MEMPHIS NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Memphis, Tennessee apartment complex early Friday morning, June 28, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to WREG.com, “It reportedly happened on Barbara Circle in the Jennifer Meadows Apartments complex. Police said the call came in as a shooting and home invasion call.” When officers arrived, “they found a man had been shot but he was able to also fire several rounds at the three suspects,” according to the report. Two shooting victims arrived at Methodist North Hospital minutes after the shooting but it is unclear if they were associated with the incident.

The investigation is ongoing.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victim and others at the time of the shooting?
Was the complex aware of any suspicious activity or suspicious people on property prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for his injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect his interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

July 2, 2019

Product Defect? Efren Perez-Sanchez Killed When Pressure Washer Tank Explodes at Orem, Utah Greenhouse.

by The Murray Law Firm

Efren Perez-Sanchez Killed When Pressure Washer Tank Explodes at Orem, Utah Greenhouse. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Was safety negligence or an equipment malfunction a factor in this loss of life and could it have been prevented? Read ‘Our Legal Take’ below to find out if the victim’s family may have legal avenues for justice and claims for substantial compensation.

Orem News

Orem, Utah police are investigating after an air tank explosion killed a man while he was working, Thursday morning, June 27, 2019. According to KSL.com, “[a] man was using a tank to help spray plants at [a] Farm and Greenhouse, located at 1600 North 1545 West in Orem, around 8:30 a.m. Thursday…[t]he tank failed and exploded, killing the man.” ABC4.com has identified the man as “Efren Perez-Sanchez of Lindon.” The incident is still under investigation.

Read Our Legal Take below to learn whether Mr. Perez-Sanchez’s family may have an avenue to justice.

Our Legal Take

Greenhouse employees, vendors and guests have a right to safety and security while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the safety measures provided both at the greenhouse and by the manufacturer of the air tank, and whether this tragic incident may have been prevented. Relevant factual and legal inquires include, but are not limited to:

What air tank safety features, such as an alarm or emergency shut off, were in place to protect Mr. Perez-Sanchez?
Did any such safety features fail?
Was the tragedy a result of a catastrophic equipment malfunction?
Was the manufacturer or property owner aware of the potential safety risks to employees?
Were any attempts made to service, recall or replace the air tank prior to the incident?

Under Workers’ Compensation laws, our legal team suggests that the family of Efren Perez-Sanchez will most likely be entitled to significant compensation as a result of this accident. While Mr. Long’s family should be eligible for benefits under workers compensation laws, they may also hold a substantial third-party civil claim against the designer or manufacturer of the air tank. Based on its history and experience in representing families in workers compensation and product liability claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that Mr. Perez-Sanchez’s family should retain legal counsel without delay so as to ensure that all evidence connected to the incident is preserved.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS

The Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for individuals who have been hurt, or families whose loved ones have been lost, in a work accidents and as a consequence of an unsafe property. We have obtained well over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for the family of a worker who lost his life at an unsafe property as consequence of a product defect. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 27, 2019

Preventable Security Failure? Dari’one Flanigan Killed, Another Injure, in Jacksonville Gas Station Shooting.

by The Murray Law Firm

Dari’one Flanigan Killed, One Other Person Injured in Jacksonville Gas Station Shooting. (News4Jax.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this shooting death of Dari’One Flanigan and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

JACKSONVILLE NEWS

Gunfire erupted Monday evening, June 24, 2019 at a Jacksonville, Florida gas station leaving one teen adult man dead and another person injured.

According to ActionNewsJax.com, “An 18-year-old Jacksonville man is dead after he and another person were shot at [a] gas station on North Main Street.” News4Jax.com has identified the victim as ” 18-year-old Dari’one Flanigan.” Per the report, “police responded about 5:30 p.m. Monday to a shooting on Main Street just south of Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway…[p]olice learned two victims took themselves to nearby UF Health hospital.”

Media reports indicate that no suspects have been identified and the investigation is ongoing.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Gas Station and convenience store patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
What security measures, such as monitored surveillance cameras, clear windows, and visible security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
Was there any suspicious people or activity on the property prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the family of Dari’one Flanigan may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for his loss. In addition, any other victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for his injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Dari’one Flanigan and any other victims retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 27, 2019

Security Negligence? Rocky Creek Apartments Shooting, Greenville, Leaves One Man in Critical Condition.

by The Murray Law Firm

Shooting at Rocky Creek Apartments in Greenville Leaves One Man in Critical Condition. (FoxCarolina.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Greenville apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Grennville, South Carolina apartment complex early Wednesday morning, June 26, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to FoxCarolina.com, “the shooting occurred at the Rocky Creek Apartments located on Woodruff Road around 1:29 a.m.” WSPA.com is reporting, [w]hen deputies arrived at the scene, they found a man shot at least once.” The victim was taken to a local hospital and was listed to be in critical condition, according to the report.

The shooter is in custody according to the media outlets.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victims and others at the time of the shooting?
Was the complex aware of any suspicious activity or suspicious people on property prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 27, 2019

Justice Available? La Bella Palms Apartment Complex Shooting Injures 13-Year-Old Boy, 10-Year-Old Girl.

by The Murray Law Firm

13-Year-Old Boy, 10-Year-Old Girl Injured in La Bella Palms Apartment Complex Shooting. (WFAA.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Dallas apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victims? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

DALLAS NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Dallas, Texas apartment complex early Tuesday morning, June 25, 2019, leaving two children injured. According to DallasNews.com, “Dallas police are investigating the shooting at La Bella Palms in the 9400 block of Royal Lane.” Just after 2 a.m., a group fired several rounds from an automatic weapon into the apartment. A 13-year-old boy and a 10-year-old girl were injured during the shooting. the boy was shot in the head and the girl suffered minor injuries as her father pulled her to safety, according to WFAA.com. Both children were sent to Children’s Medical Center Dallas and are in stable condition per the report.

No suspects have been identified.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victims and others at the time of the shooting?
How was the suspect able to gain access to the complex?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victims retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 25, 2019

Justice Available? Shirley Jean Jones, Steven Tinch, Johntavier Moss Killed in Abbeville Apartment Complex Shooting.

by The Murray Law Firm

Shirley Jean Jones, Steven Tinch, Johntavier Moss Killed in Abbeville Apartment Complex Shooting. (WYFF4.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting deaths at an Abbeville apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s families? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at an Abbeville, South Carolina apartment complex early Sunday morning, June 23, 2019, leaving three people dead and one injured. According to FoxCarolina.com, “Abbeville Police and EMS received a call around 3:09 a.m. Sunday in reference to a shooting at…Apartments on Cambridge Street.” WYFF4.com is reporting that when police arrived they found “two of the victims dead. A third victim died at a hospital. A fourth victim was also shot.” According to the report, the victims have been identified as “Shirley Jean Jones, 62, Steven Tinch, 26, and Johntavier Moss, 24.”

Media reports indicate that a suspect has been arrested and charged.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect Shirley Jean Jones, Steven Tinch, Johntavier Moss and others at the time of the shooting?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
Was the complex aware of any disturbances or suspicious activity prior to the shooting?
How was the suspect able to gain access to the complex?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the families of Shirley Jean Jones, Steven Tinch, and Johntavier Moss may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss. In addition, any other victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the families of Shirley Jean Jones, Steven Tinch, and Johntavier Moss and any other injured victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 24, 2019

Preventable Incident? Mattew Lu Tragically Killed in Gastonia, NC Trampoline Park Accident.

by The Murray Law Firm

12-Year-Old Boy Fatally Injured in Gastonia Rock Wall Climbing Accident. (WSOCtv.com)

Did safety negligence contribute to the tragic loss of a young boy and are justice and compensation available to his family?

Gastonia News

A 12-year-old boy has tragically died after falling from a climbing feature at a trampoline park in Gaston County, North Carolina Wednesday night, June 19, 2019, according to WSOCtv.com. Fox46Charlotte.com is reporting, “[t]he accident occurred…as the child was climbing a rock wall at [a] Trampoline Park located at 3940 E Franklin Blvd. in Gastonia.” Per the report, “[a]ccording to the 911 call log with Gaston County…the child was breathing abnormally after falling about 15 feet from the wall.” The boy was rushed to Levine Children’s Hospital in Charlotte, but was sadly unable to revover from his injuries. Fox46Charolette.com has identified the young child as “Matthew Lu.”

“There are several states that regulate trampoline parks or have proposed such action, but North Carolina is not one of them,” according to WSOCtv.com. Fox46Charlotte.com is reporting, “according to the NC Department of Labor, trampoline parks are excluded from the Amusement Device Safety Act and therefore are not regulated by the NCDOL, Elevator and Amusement Device Bureau.”

The investigation is ongoing according to the media outlets.

Our Legal Take

Entertainment complex patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of safety provided on the property and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have there been prior injuries on the property?
Was the victim secured in a climbing harness and, if so, was it properly secured prior to the accident
Was there a sufficiently padded mat at the base of the climbing wall?
Was there a medical emergency protocol in place and, if so, was it followed by employees?
What inspection protocol does the establishment have for its entertainment features?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the business owner or management failed to provide adequate safety and procedures to protect those on its premises, the family of the young Mattew Lu may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling safety negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent safety case, it is imperative that the victim’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of safety negligence, including at entertainment complexes that cater to families and young children. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 24, 2019

Manitoba Apartments Shooting, Fort Worth, Injures Ice Cream Man; Preventable Incident?

by The Murray Law Firm

Man Selling Ice Cream Injured in Manitoba Apartments Shooting. (Star-Telegram.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Fort Worth apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

FORT WORTH NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Fort Worth, Texas apartment complex Wednesday, June 19, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to Star-Telegram.com, the victim “was shot about 5 p.m. at the Manitoba Apartments, at Gunnison and Mojave trails.” The victim was pushing a cart selling ice cream at the time of the shooting and police believe it was likely a robbery attempt. Per the report, “[t]he victim was shot twice and was in critical condition at John Peter Smith Hospital.” No suspects have been detained.

NBCdfw.com reported on a homicide in this area in May 2018.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victim and others at the time of the shooting?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
Was the complex aware of any suspicious activity or suspicious people on property prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

June 24, 2019

Durham Apartment Complex Robbery leaves One Person Shot and Injured; Lapse in Security?

by The Murray Law Firm

Durham Apartment Complex Robbery leaves One Person Shot and Injured. (ABC11.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Durham apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

DURHAM NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Durham, North Carolina apartment complex early Sunday morning, June 16, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to ABC11.com, two men were robbed in an apartment parking lot overnight. Per the report, ” it happened around 2 a.m. on Chalk Level Road when two men approached two others in the lot when a fight ensued.” One of the suspects pulled a gun and shot one of the victims in the arm. The suspects then took both victims wallets and ran away, according to the report. The victim was taken to the hospital for his injuries.

No suspects have been detained.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Residents and guests of apartment complexes have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The level of security provided at the apartment complex is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
How was the suspect able to gain access to the complex?
What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victim and others at the time of the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the apartment complex owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its residents and visitors, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.