The Legal Chronicle

May 20, 2019

Jaylen Bradshaw Killed, Others Injured in Williamsburg County Nightclub Shooting; Preventable Tragedy?

by The Murray Law Firm

Jaylen Bradshaw Killed, Others Injured in Williamsburg County Nightclub Shooting. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Could the death from a shooting at a Williamsburg County nightclub have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the family of Jaylen Bradshaw?

Local News

Gunfire rang out at a Williamsburg County, South Carolina nightclub early Sunday morning, May 19, 2019, leaving one young man dead. According to Live5News.com, “around 1 a.m., deputies responded to the Huell Enterprises night club on Blakely Road for a shooting.” When officers arrived they found a deceased victim, according to the report. The Williamsburg County Coroners Office has identified the victim as “Jaylen Bradshaw, 21, of Greeleyville,” according to KingstreeNews.com. The media outlets report that other victims had been shot at the location but were taken to the hospital in personal vehicles.

Our Legal Take

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided on the property and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
Were security measures, such as bright lighting, surveillance cameras, security personnel, and security patrol in place to deter crime and protect the Jaylen Bradshaw and others at the time of the shooting?
Does the nightclub have a protocol to check guests for deadly weapons prior to entering the establishment?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the property owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on the premises, the family of Jaylen Bradshaw may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss. In addition, any other victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the family of Jaylen Bradshaw and any other injured victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

Our Results: We’ve Obtained Over $100 Million in Verdicts and Settlements for our Clients

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 16, 2019

Colby Jake Slayton, 18, Fatally Injured in Cherokee County, AL Car Accident; Justice Available?

by The Murray Law Firm

Colby Jake Slayton, 18, Fatally Injured in Cherokee County, AL Car Accident. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Cherokee County, Alabama News

A car accident on County Road 14 involving two vehicles took the life of a Spring Garden High School student Wednesday morning according to WEISradio.com. According to the news report, “[a]t 7:10am, emergency personnel were dispatched to the scene of a two-vehicle collision on County Road 14, just off of 19, which involved a car and a large truck outfitted with a trailer hauling a bulldozer.” One individual was fatally injured according to the report, and that person was identified as “Colby Jake Slayton, 18….” The WEISradio.com news story reports the accident happened when “Slayton, driving a 2008 Cadillac, was traveling eastbound into the sunlight when his vehicle crashed into the rear of the trailer – which was parked in the roadway – after the driver of the 2007 International truck had stopped, preparing to offload the bulldozer.” Coosavalleynews.com reports “This was the second Cherokee County high school student killed in two weeks as the result of a wreck.”

Our Legal Take

As the details of this tragedy continue to develop, and if the truck driver is deemed to be at fault for improperly parking the vehicle in the roadway, the family of Colby Jake Slayton may elect to seek justice and file a civil claim for their loss. Based upon its extensive experience and success handling these types of motor vehicle claims in Georgia, The Murray Law Firm suggests that Colby Jake Slayton’s family should retain an experienced personal injury firm to protect their interests and ensure an unbiased investigation. Photographs of the roadways and vehicles involved and a review of surveillance footage from nearby businesses or properties, if any exists, will need to be performed immediately before any evidence is damaged or destroyed.

Our Results: Over $100 Million in Verdicts and Settlements

The Murray Law Firm has obtained over $100 million dollars in verdicts and settlements for its Clients, including for victims of Georgia motor vehicle accidents such as this one. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at CALL NOW: 888-842-1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (CLICK HERE)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 16, 2019

Jose Villarreal, Adan Villarreal, Killed in Kingsville Apartment Complex Shooting; Lapse in Security?

by The Murray Law Firm

Jose Villarreal, Adan Villarreal, Killed in Kingsville Apartment Complex Shooting. (Stock Photo: MurrayLegal.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the loss of Jose Villarreal and Adan Villarreal and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Kingsville, Texas apartment complex Monday evening, May 13, 2019, tragically leaving two men dead. According to KRIStv.com, “[p]olice were called to the Utopian Apartments in the 1700 block of N. 1st St. around 8:30 p.m.” Caller.com is reporting, “[w]hen officers arrived, a man was found at the bottom of the stairs in one of the buildings with multiple gunshot wounds…[a]nother man was found in an apartment with several gunshot wounds.” According to the report, the men were taken to a local hospital, where they died from their injuries. “The men were identified as Jose Villarreal, 37, and Adan Villarreal, 41, of Alice.”

Two suspects have been arrested in connection with the incident.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

How were the suspects able to gain access on to the property?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Jose Villarreal and Adan Villarreal at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the families of Jose Villarreal and Adan Villarreal may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the families of Jose Villarreal and Adan Villarreal retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 16, 2019

William Walker, Charles Reeves II, Killed in Indianapolis Gentleman’s Nightclub Shooting; Justice and Compensation Available to the Families?

by The Murray Law Firm

William Walker, Charles Reeves, Killed in Indianapolis Gentleman’s Nightclub Shooting. (Fox59.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this Indianapolis gentleman’s club shooting and are justice and compensation available to the victims families?

LOCAL NEWS

A shooting at an Indianapolis, Indiana gentleman’s club left two men dead, early Saturday morning, May 11, 2019. According to Fox59.com, “Indianapolis Metro Police Department confirmed two people were shot at Club Venus, a nightclub located near the intersection of N. Tibbs Avenue and W. 16th. Street…[t]he shooting happened just after 1 a.m.” Both victims were pronounced dead at the scene and have been identified as “William Walker, age 23, and Charles Reeves II, age 42,” According to the news report. A motive and suspects have not been identified, and the incident remains under investigation. Over the past few years, multiple shootings have occurred at Club Venus. WRAL.com reported on a shooting at Club Venus from April 2018, WISHtv.com reported on a shooting from June 2017 and Fox59.com reported on a shooting from August 2017.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the nightclub and whether this assault may have been prevented.

Did the establishment make any security changes after any prior incidents of violence on the property?
What security measures, such as visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the incident?
Does the establishment have any protocol to check for deadly weapons prior to patrons entering the facility?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the nightclub owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the families of William Walker and Charles Reeves II may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the families of William Walker and Charles Reeves II retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence and their families. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 14, 2019

Jahquan Peterson, Mary Carmichael Killed in Shooting at Columbia Apartment Complex; Justice Available to the Families?

by The Murray Law Firm

Jahquan Peterson, Mary Carmichael Killed in Shooting at Columbia Apartment Complex. (WIStv.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the loss of Jahquan Peterson and Mary Carmichael and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Columbia, South Carolina apartment complex Saturday night, May 12, 2019, tragically leaving a young man and woman dead. According to TheState.com, “[t]he shooting happened Saturday night at 221 Skyland Drive.” WIStv.com is reporting, “CPD and the Richland County Coroner’s Office have identified the victims as 23-year-old Mary Carmichael and 26-year-old Jahquan Peterson. Both were shot in the upper body.”

Media reports indicate that no suspects have been identified yet.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

How were the suspects able to gain access on to the property?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Jahquan Peterson and Mary Carmichael at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the families of Jahquan Peterson and Mary Carmichael may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the families of Jahquan Peterson and Mary Carmichael retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 10, 2019

Brandon Fenton Fatally Shot in Alleged Home Invasion at a Blacklick Apartment Complex; Security Failure?

by The Murray Law Firm

Brandon Fenton Fatally Shot in Alleged Home Invasion at a Blacklick Apartment Complex. (NBC4i.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the home invasion shooting death at a Blacklick apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

An alleged home invasion on Thursday, May 9, 2019, at a Blacklick, Ohio apartment complex left one young man dead. According to NBC4i.com, “at approximately 1:16pm, officers responded to a report of a shooting in the area of Cotterrew Drive and Arnbrae Drive, at [an] apartment complex…[o]fficers were able to determine that a shooting had occurred inside of one of the apartments there.” 10tv.com is reporting, “[w]itnesses told police unknown suspects forced their way inside their apartment, where they ordered the victims onto the ground and took property from them at gunpoint.” According to the news report, “one of the victims, 23-year-old Brandon Fenton, tried to confront one of the suspects and was shot.”

The incident is still under investigation according to the media reports.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this home invasion may have been prevented.

What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Brandon Fenton and others at the time of the incident?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property?
How was the suspect able to gain access on to the property?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Brandon Fenton’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that Brandon Fenton’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 9, 2019

Arnold Person Killed in Fort Lauderdale Nightclub Shooting; Preventable Tragedy?

by The Murray Law Firm

Arnold Person Killed in Fort Lauderdale Nightclub Shooting. (NBCMiami.com)

Could the death from a shooting at a Fort Lauderdale nightclub have been prevented and are justice and compensation available to the family of Arnold Person?

Local News

Gunfire rang out at a Fort Lauderdale, Florida nightclub early Wednesday night, April 8, 2019, leaving one man dead and two others injured. According to NBCMiami.com, “the incident took place just before midnight inside [a] nightclub in [a] mall off Sunrise Boulevard.” The news story reports “[a]n early investigation found the shooting occurred as a result of an altercation inside the establishment, but nothing has yet been confirmed as their investigation continues.” According to Sun-Sentinel.com, “[t]he shooter opened fire shortly before midnight in the nightclub in the 2400 block of Sunrise Boulevard. One person died at the scene and two others were taken to Broward Health Medical Center.” The report identifies the man as Arnold Person. Media reports indicate that the suspect was detained at the scene.

Our Legal Take

Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided on the property and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
Were security measures, such as bright lighting, surveillance cameras, security personnel, and security patrol in place to deter crime and protect the Arnold Person at the time of the shooting?
Does the nightclub have a protocol to check guests for deadly weapons prior to entering the establishment?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the property owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on the premises, the family of Arnold Person may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the family of Arnold Person retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

Our Results: We’ve Obtained Over $100 Million in Verdicts and Settlements for our Clients

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 8, 2019

Reno Apartment Complex Shooting Leaves One Man Injured; Was Shooting Preventable?

by The Murray Law Firm

Reno Apartment Complex Shooting Leaves One Man Injured. (KOLOtv.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at a Reno apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Reno, Nevada apartment complex Monday, May 6, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to KOLOtv.com, “Police were called about 6:15PM…to an apartment complex on the 700 block of Brinkby Avenue.” The news story reports “two men, who did not know each other, were in a fight in the courtyard and one shot the other in the abdomen.” The victim was taken to a hospital but there was no word on his condition according to the media report.

The incident remains under investigation.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

What security measures were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property?
Was there any suspicious activity reported prior to the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 8, 2019

Coffee Creek Apartments Shooting Injures One; Justice Available for the Victim?

by The Murray Law Firm

One Man Injured in Coffee Creek Apartments Shooting. (News9.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the shooting at an Edmond apartment complex and are justice and compensation available to the victim?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at a Edmond, Oklahoma apartment complex Saturday evening, May 4, 2019, leaving one man injured. According to KFOR.com, “just before 6:15 p.m., officers were called to the Coffee Creek apartments near 15th and Fretz…when they arrived on scene they found one victim with multiple gunshot wounds to the stomach.” The condition and identity of the victim is unknown according to the report. The news story reports that the suspect “called 911, stating he wanted to turn himself in…was found on the south side of the complex hiding behind a bush.” It is reported that “an argument over property is what led up to the shooting.” The suspect was booked “on a complaint of shooting with intent to kill and possessing a firearm after a conviction of a felony,” according to the media report.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
Have there been prior incidents of violence on the property?
Was the suspect a resident of the complex? How was the suspect able to gain access on to the property?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for his injuries.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

May 7, 2019

Margaret Danielle Blanding, Ezquiel Estrich Killed in Anderson Apartment Complex Shooting; Security Failure?

by The Murray Law Firm

Margaret Danielle Blanding, Ezquiel Estrich Killed in Anderson Apartment Complex Shooting. (WYFF$.com)

Did negligent security contribute to the loss of Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family?

LOCAL NEWS

Gunfire erupted at an Anderson, South Carolina apartment complex early Friday morning, May 3, 2019, tragically leaving a young man and woman dead. According to WYFF4.com, “[t]he shooting was reported Friday about 1:20 a.m. at the Fairview Gardens Apartments off Williamson Road in Anderson.” The news report identified the victims as “Margaret Danielle Blanding, 18, and Ezquiel Estrich, 23.” According to the report, “Blanding’s body was found outside the apartments and Estrich’s body was found inside an apartment.” WSPA.com is reporting, “the shooting [suspects] fled the scene and led officers on a high-speed chase into Hart County, Georgia…the chase ended when the suspect car started to spark. [The suspects] surrendered and were taken into custody by Anderson Police.”

WSPA.com reported on a shooting at this apartment complex in March 2019.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Apartment residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided at the apartment complex and whether this shooting may have been prevented.

How were the suspects able to gain access on to the property?
How many prior incidents of violence have happened on the property and were any security improvements made after those incidents?
What security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, monitored surveillance cameras, and visible security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the families of Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the families of Margaret Danielle Blanding and Ezquiel Estrich retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.